🔗 Share this article

The beluga known as Jelly Bean’s daughter Bertie Botts is an adorable small “sweetheart”. Orion – called “Onion Ring” – is a large but very loyal friend. Zephyr has “constant motion” and moves like a worm. Lillooet is the “loving presence” with a heart of gold.

A group of thirty enclosed beluga whales in a Canadian entertainment facility have been caught in a tussle between a shuttered park, local and national governments and animal rights activists.

But those working directly with the whales say the impassioned controversy over their fate often ignores the complexities of the whales who, after living their entire lives in captivity, have been closely studied by the caretakers who interact with them daily.

After the Canadian government blocked the export of the belugas to a foreign facility, the embattled facility near Niagara Falls where they are kept threatened to euthanize them unless the federal government pays for the expense of their survival. The nation’s fisheries minister has denied that ultimatum, placing the thirty whales in an dangerously unstable situation.

Highly Cognitive Sea Creatures

Scientists say that beluga whales’ neural makeup, along with their vocal imitation skills, cognitive challenges and communal behavior indicate they are deeply intelligent animals – something Kristy Burgess learned first-hand.

She spent a significant period as a marine mammal specialist, a role that entailed earning the trust of the aquatic animals.

“Establishing those relationships over time takes a lot of dedication and a lot of affection. At the outset, they’re very unsure of you,” she said. “In time, you gain shared confidence. And they start being more trusting with you. It’s just so extraordinary and gratifying.”

Burgess knew the whales were very smart, but she says she was even so amazed by the details and quirks in their dispositions. She formed a particular love for a pair of whales with different personalities.

“Eve selected me. The other required effort,” she said. “They altered the way I perceive connection.”

Growing Opposition and Facility Decline

Her connection with the whales evolved against a background of growing public opposition to their enclosure.

During her tenure at the attraction, seven belugas and the park’s one killer whale, Kiska, died. In all, nineteen belugas have died at the park since 2019, a number which the facility links to natural mortality, but which advocates say indicates the inadequate care in which they were maintained.

The park did not open to the visitors over the recent season, but the former trainer says she observed directly consequences of the shutdown. “Structural materials is deteriorating from the enclosures because they’re in disrepair and not being repaired. The whales are curious and so they pick it up and swim around with pieces in their mouth. It’s distressing to see.”

The park did not reply to a request for comment, but previously claimed: “The whales … obtain far superior medical attention and around the clock care than any human in the Britain, or anywhere else.”

Fate in Limbo and Proposed Solutions

Burgess was fired from the facility in the spring following the passing of a beluga, an ailing beluga the employees had to humanely kill. She said the facility thought particulars of the incident were leaked to the press and she was released soon after.

The uncertainty over the whales’ future has left Burgess and staff members in distress. She says the facility’s warning to euthanize its whales is a leverage tool and is a “extremely difficult” endeavor, adding any efforts to humanely kill even a one beluga would require “considerable manpower”, equipment and machinery.

“It’s impossible in hell the staff would ever do it,” she said.

She backs calls for the whales to be transferred immediately from the facility, with its failing enclosures and reduced personnel.

In the autumn, the nation’s government official rejected a proposal to send the whales to an overseas location.

“Granting the application would have meant a ongoing situation in confinement and a reversion to public entertainment,” the minister commented. “As the public, we know that marine mammals belong in the wild, not in tanks for our enjoyment. I could not in ethical standing permit an transfer that would continue the conditions these belugas have suffered.”

But Burgess said the minister’s remarks reflect a wider lack of awareness of the realities of existence for belugas living their whole lives in enclosures.

“The public needs to realize these are whales that have lived entirely in confinement and they will need constant supervision for the foreseeable future,” she said. “People just don’t comprehend that it’s not as simple as saying ‘shut it down’.”

Alternative Habitat and Continuing Discussion

As decision makers work to find a answer, suggestions have emerged, some of which have questionable practicality. A suggested plan called for the belugas to be let go into the wilds of northern regions – where whales are a primary resource of sustenance for local populations.

A planned protected area in the province of eastern Canada, which now received official endorsement, has proven highly debated. The prospective site, which includes a large area of enclosed sea water, doesn’t yet exist. Supporters remain optimistic that it could in time represent a permanent resolution for a number of the whales.

But, the former trainer says, among staff she’s discussed with, there is “skepticism there” about what she said is “merely an trial” in the whales’ fate.

Some experts say the idea of a refuge indicates a changing attitudes away from zoos and aquariums and could represent a viable plan in the near future.

Charles Vinick, head of the plan, said the site will simulate the mental engagement and feeding regimen the whales obtain from trainers, albeit in a significantly bigger area. He said after the well-being of whales is fully assessed, which could take months|an extended period|